Views: 0 Author: Site Editor Publish Time: 2025-04-02 Origin: Site
The drug-carrying capacity of nanocellulose is closely related to its crystal structure and surface chemical groups:
Cellulose Iβ crystal form (mainly found in plant-source nanocellulose): has a highly ordered hydrogen bond network, suitable for physical adsorption of drug molecules
Amorphous zone (accounting for 30-50% of cellulose nanofibers): can be used as a storage for drug embedding to increase drug loading
Surface functional groups:
Hydroxyl group: The drug can be covalently linked through esterification and etherification reactions
Carboxylic (TEMPO oxidation introduction): Enhances water solubility and is used for pH response release
Sulfate group (acid hydrolysis residue): drug loaded by electrostatic action
Table 1: Comparison of physical and chemical properties of different nanocelluloses
Characteristic | Cellulose Nanocrystals | Cellulose Nanocrystals | Bacteria Nanocrystals |
---|---|---|---|
Diameter (nm) | 5-20 | 10-50 | 20-100 |
Length (μm) | 0.1-1 | 1-10 | 1-50 |
Crystalline degree (%) | 70-90 | 50-70 | 60-80 |
Physical adsorption
Hydrogen bonding: Polar groups in drug molecules form hydrogen bonds with the hydroxyl groups of nanocellulose
Hydrophobic interaction: Non-polar drugs can be embedded in the amorphous region of cellulose nanofibers
Electrostatic adsorption: Positively charged drugs combine with negatively charged cellulose nanocrystals
Chemical coupling
Covalent linkage: Form an amide bond with amino-containing drugs by activating carboxyl groups
Dynamic covalent bonds: borate bonds for glucose-responsive insulin release
Zero-order release: controlled release of pore diffusion of bacterial nanocellulose
Higuchi model: Drug diffusion dominance of cellulose nanocrystals
Korsmeyer-Peppas model: Super Case II forwarding when n value is greater than 0.89
pH Response System
Mechanism: Protonation of carboxyl groups at low pH leads to weakening of electrostatic effects
Experimental verification: Simulate the release difference in gastric juice and intestinal fluid
Enzyme triggered release
Cellulase response: Enzyme secreted by colon bacteria degrades bacterial nanocellulose
MMP-2 response: Cellulose nanofiber graft cleavable peptide
Redox response
Disulfide bond: breakage in tumor hyperglutathione environment
Case 1: Cellulose nanocrystals targeted by folic acid receptors-doesorbacterium
Construction: Folic acid is coupled to cellulose nanocrystals through polyethylene glycol spacer
Efficacy: 78% reduction in tumor volume in mice
Case 2: Photothermal and chemotherapy collaborative system
Support: Cellulose nanofiber filaments/polydopamine composite hydrogel
Results: The tumor was completely ablated under laser irradiation
Case: Colon-targeted cellulose nanofiber filaments-methotrexate
Design: Cellulose nanofiber fiber coated alginate microspheres
Results: The concentration of colonic drugs in the rat model is 20 times that of the stomach
Large-scale production:
The waste acid treatment cost of cellulose nanocrystalline acid hydrolysis is high
Long fermentation cycle of bacterial nanocellulose
In vivo safety:
Cellulose nanocrystals accumulate in the liver after intravenous injection
Lack of long-term toxicity data
Process optimization: Preparation of homogeneous cellulose nanofiber filaments by microfluidic control technology
Functional improvements:
Introducing hyaluronic acid coating to reduce macrophage phagocytosis
Gamma ray sterilization after drug loading
Genetic drug delivery: Cellulose nanofiber/CRISPR-Cas9 complex
Self-oxygen supply system: cellulose nanocrystals supported catalase
AI-assisted design: Machine learning predicts drug-carrier binding energy
Table 2: Nanocellulose drug carriers that have entered clinical research
Carrier Types | Loading Drug | Indications | Clinical Trial Stage |
---|---|---|---|
Bacterial Nanocellulose Dressing | Silver nanoparticles | Chronic wound infection | Phase II |
Cellulose nanocrystals-Paclitaxel | Taxol | Ovarian cancer | Phase I |